Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Canadian DOGS AT RISK

Ramifications of Bill 132
Home
*NEW*
OTTAWA NOV. 28th,I WAS THERE
Toronto, Nov 28/04
* MISSION *
BILL 132
Existing and Latest By-Laws
Pics and Comments
***GET INVOLVED***
Links
Calendar of Events/Demonstrations
Interesting Articles
Guestbook

To view Bill 132 in its entirety...click here
 
In plain language, Bill 132 will include provisions that:

1.  Broadens police powers so that, with or without a warrant, police
may enter a person's home on hearsay or a complaint from a neighbour and seize a dog, regardless of breed.
 
2.  fails to include  "with provocation"  as part of the criteria for determining if a dog's behaviour was inappropriate, regardless of breed.  The owner is left with only the defense of having exercised due diligence should an incident occur.  Subsesquently, a criminal could conceivably break into your home and if your dog defends you or the property, you could be fined.  A fine of up to $10,000 is being considered.
 
3.  provides for fines if your dog is accused of menacing behaviour.   Menacing behaviour could merely be a dog barking and bobbing along its fence line.  There is no definition for menacing behaviour in this Bill.
 
4.  state that it is incumbent upon the owner to prove the lineage of his/her dog.  There is no means for an owner to prove that dog of an unknown breed mix is a certain breed in court, something veterinarians do not have the time to do, and then hope that the testimony given by that veterinarian is better than the testimony heard from the Crown's expert witness.
 
If you read between the lines, Mr. Bryant's "solution" for the volume of restricted dogs that would be surrendered to local animal control facilities is to broaden the scope of the Animal Research Act.
 
Mr. Bryant's Bill 132 discriminates against all responsible pet owners in this province.

copied from NCCPD website

PUNISH the DEED
NOT the BREED